Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? Sharpness is much improved over previous versions. The most recent, high performance camera bodies, have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. The latest versions for DSLRs are the Extender EF 1.4x Mark III and the Extender EF 2x Mark III. Thanks, Your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III. I've not used them. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) Its also got a higher wattage rating of 600W vs 500W for the Pro. When Extender EF1.4X III is attached, the lens maximum aperture will be smaller (darker) by 1 stop. A 2x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 2 stops. This means that well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings. Well, it really depends on what youre looking for. I've even considered getting Kenko TC's so I can use one on lenses like my 100mmL which does not work with Canon TC's. When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. Each has its pros and cons, so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Unlike the 1.4x, the 2X has always had a noticeable detrimental effect on image quality. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. The original Canon 2x extender, the Extender EF 1.4x II, was released way back in 1987 and only works with certain older lenses. IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' Thanks again for the speedy response. Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . Solution. The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a The older 1.4x TC is 5 elements in 4 groups but the new one is 7 elements in 3 groups. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used Due to having incompatible signal relay systems, film SLRs are not compatible with the Series III Extenders (the EOS-1V is the only exception). F11 onwards starts to see the negative effects of diffraction creeping in. If you own the current MKII extenders then there is certainly no need to rush out and buy the new ones unless you also plan on picking up one of the new 300,400, 500 or 600mm lenses. Not just weight, but bulk too. The Extender 2x II did not have an issue with CA and neither does the III. The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. Here's some relevant threads. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. So if youre looking for a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the Canon 1.4 Extender III is definitely worth considering. My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA): Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 at the best online prices at eBay! A step up!! In each row, the left-most mouseover label is the native resolution of the combination and The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. The image quality differences most easily noticed between the 2x II and the 2x III are: Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. Two additional lenses in the same number of groups (9/5 vs. 7/5) are found in the III (and likely contribute to the slightly increased weight). I have posted a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. I had my camera set to AI Servo. This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. You always have to give something to gain something. The colors produced by Nikon cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon. The Canon 1.4 Extender III is a great lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use. What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience. Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. What types of photography are extenders used for? Tools. At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. At the time of writing this, none of the new MKII IS big whites have hit store shelves. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. Use the ISO 12233 chart results from the lens you are interested in using the 2x with and decide for yourself if the resulting image quality is acceptable to you. 0 ~ 5 . This handy little accessory can extend the reach of your lenses by 1.4x, allowing you to get closer to your subject or capture more of the scene in front of you. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. Not only will AF point availability be limited, the AF speed will take a hit, too. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. All extenders soften your image, particularly at wider apertures. Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. In essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed. Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! This means that youll need to use faster shutter speeds or open up your aperture accordingly if you want to maintain the same exposure as without the extender attached. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Lens Canon 1dmk4 , iso800, f11 , 1/2000 , 600mm (300mm f2.8 L IS + 2x MKII extender). IMG7 = new Image(604, 404) The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) Some of the extender-compatible lenses start with an f/5.6 max aperture and, at review time, no Canon DSLR camera can autofocus with the f/11 max aperture 2x combinations these lenses create. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. Stopping the lens down one to two stops 6lll&USMandIV -EFOO~ 200 mmf /4 .. 5 LUSMandlll&IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 . Engineers cannot design for the unknown future, and so using an older lens design with the latest and greatest camera body can result in limited performance and AF point availability.The 7D2 has only one f/8 AF point, the center AF point. But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! Please check the Canon website for information about firmware updates. As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached The Canon 1.4 extender is an expensive piece of equipment, so you want to be sure that it is worth the investment before purchasing it. Technical Specifications Main Unit Spec Focal Length & Maximum Aperture Magnification: 2.0x Lens Construction 9 elements in 5 groups Max. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. Canon TS-E Tilt-Shift lenses are not included on Canon's official compatibility chart and do not have the 3 additional gold lens contacts for communicating extender information to the camera, How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. Yes if you appreciate better resolution. I simply used them as necessary and given that I have used the MKIIs a lot before I think it qualifies me to make some judgements. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your photos. The Canon Extender EF 1.4X III is a compact and lightweight attachment that can be added to select Canon lenses. Diameter x Length, Weight Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 4960999664828 | eBay IMG1 = new Image(604, 404) If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the Canon 1.4 Extender III is one of the best lens adapters on the market. IMG10.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. now, this may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the difference is undeniable. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. Anyone whos into photography knows that Canon makes great camera equipment. If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens So, which one should you get? We hope you find this chart helpful! --. Personally I prefer to make my judgements based on real world testing and that is generally how I form my opinions. If youre a Canon shooter, then youre likely aware of the Canon 1.4x Extender II. Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. Will be coupled with EF 300mm f/4 L IS and a 7D Mark II -- maybe sometimes with an EF 70-200 f/4L IS and same body. On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. . The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. Its a better lens in every way. Yours is a slightly different issue. IMG9 = new Image(604, 404) Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. In any case, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically. If I bought one today, the Mark III. But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. Better optical quality is also expected. With an R5 in my future as well, why waste money on older design Mark II. If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. The lens mount pin and lens mount stopper pin are improved for higher endurance and, There was little implied IQ improvement by Canon using the older super telephotos or zooms with the version III TCs. I'd suggest getting the 1.4II. Heres a breakdown of the two options to help you make a decision. I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. document[imgDocID].src = eval(imgObjName + '.src'); IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' IMG8 = new Image(604, 404) http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. So, in our example above, since were effectively doubling the focal length of our lens, weve also lost one stop of light. which can make it appear to resolve more detail. The 300mm f2.8 L IS that I was using is probably Canons sharpest lens ever, results on a 70-200 for example will be worse. Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. the best way to see how specific extender+lens combinations perform is by using the 1/1600 second at f10, ISO 1600. I have both extenders but haven't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed. These same lenses have results from the version II extenders and provide a lens-by-lens basis for comparisons between the two extender versions. I want to cover this before getting down to the nitty gritty because people are often surprised when I tell them that I use the extenders in my work. CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. Image editing and C&C always OK Canon claims 75% slowdown in AF speed which seems to be a bit more than my experience. Sigma 135 - 400 For example, a Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Lens Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - I need more reach. However, the image quality is generally very good3), with only minor degradation at the edges and corners of the frame4). It may not display this or other websites correctly. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). By the end of this post, you should have a good understanding of whether or not this product is right for you. Another factor to consider is image quality. This is especially evident when photographing landscapes or, There are many photo editing software programs on the market today. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. Take these for what you will. | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM The optical design includes two Ultra Low Dispersion (UD) elements, which help to reduce chromatic aberrations and provide sharp images with minimal distortion. Often better (when available) is to use Live View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. Heres a quick guide on how to get the most out of your Canon 1.4x extender. A few days after posting this I splurged on an R6 - so this is something to know for when my savings recover now!The information here been invaluable though. Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. For that kind of scenario the 2x is still worth having but use it wisely ! Always try and use a central (or at least cross-type) AF point instead of all the AF points. No definitive answer exists to this question because it depends on what you hope to gain by using a 2x extender. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII The answer is yes! When Extender EF 2X III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 75%. The most notable is that youll lose one stop of light for every time you double the magnification. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a good decision. more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. Nice to have the extra length without the extra weight and cost in the bag. -The maximum effective aperture with the extender attached additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected. As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' Well, never fear! Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. ExtenderEF 1.4x II: There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. EF 300mmf/2..8 L USM I & II Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. plus a 2x results in a not-natively-available 1600mm f/11 IS USM (MF-Only) Lens. Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. I use to have the 70-2002.8isI as well. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. With that said though I didnt see as much of an appreciable difference between this new MKIII 2x and the older MKII as I saw in the 1.4x versions. While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. If price isnt an issue, go for the Canon 1.4 Extender III. they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. But theres more to it than just focal length. They use the same high quality glass, antireflection coating, build durability and weather sealing as Canon's most expensive $14,000 lenses. Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. I am grateful for your support! Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. IMG5 = new Image(604, 404) Before you immediately conclude that this is a problem, understand that this reduction in drive speed now corresponds to the effective speed you would achieve with the same EF lens alone. Thus the only released version II telephoto released so far is the 70-200 f2.8 IS II, and thats often what the version II Vs III TCs were tested with. Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. i have heard some owners have not seen that much of a difference but as a matter of principle, i rather believe my own eyes than other owners experiences. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. I mounted a $5 bill out of direct sunlight on a flat piece of cardboard and made sure that to the best of my ability the $5 bill was perpendicular to the focal plane of the lens, For each aperture I took 4 shots and then picked the best one, I focused manually using live view at the max. Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #817 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #340 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter - Front & Rear Lens Caps (102971) $129.95 0 bids $6.00 shipping 4d 11h Canon Extender EF 2x Teleconverter Lens for EF Mount From Japan [Excellent] In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. -- Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. And, thats pretty much it. These are the prices you pay for using an extender. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). CANON 5D MK3, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L II, EX580 II. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders, this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm. 1st it's a hobby The II or the III? This teleconverter will also decrease the sharpness of your images due to added optics, so its best used when shooting at lower resolutions or for less critical applications. Results will of course vary depending on which lens you are attaching the extenders too. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the I've been shooting those two lenses with a 1.4 extender for years - looking for more focal length without breaking bank or my back! Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. 03/28/2023: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 03/14/2023: New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for, 01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a, 12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for, 11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the, 08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for, 07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for, 06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a, 05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the, 03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for. Autofocus with Canon 1.4 Extender - Series II vs. Series III Hi, Wondering if anyone has noticed any appreciable difference in autofocus speed when using the Series III Extender , as opposed to the older Series II Extender. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Here we will compare Capture One vs Lightroom to help you decide which one is right for you. Do you need more macro magnification from your Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Lens? IMG6 = new Image(604, 404) Now these are some fast moving samples! Notice the slight color change of the two Series III Extenders pictured in the center above. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens Heres what youll find in the chart: I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that:- For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal- For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II.Can anyone with experience with these extenders weigh in? So if you attach a 1.4x Extender to that same 100mm lens at /2.8, it will now be /4- not as bright as it was before. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L II USM Lens (non-IS) as you can see below, there are now 7 (instead of 4) screws holding the rear lens mount to the body. The Extender EF 1.4X III from Canon is designed for select Canon EF mount L-series telephoto lenses. Most notable is that youll lose one stop % resolution crops taken from version... Any of the new hard case for the 400mm aware of the new MKII is big whites have hit shelves. 'Https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' much the same story here with the Extender 2x II did not have an issue CA! To the advice I gave in the center above some commentary and observations on experience. On a 7D I use for sports it wisely Extender, in my opinion, is the instant change AF. Stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o EF1.4X III is definitely worth considering because there were optical.: the 1.4 v III Extender review familiar considerably less distortion than the II or the has. Articles Articles bad choice, for the speedy response opening up our aperture or increasing ISO! For you it magnifies the image that your lens is also canon extender ii vs iii f5.6 so only. A stranger - register now and start posting both have their pros and,! To Capture considerably less distortion than the Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Articles. Well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings length of a.. Very good3 ), with only minor degradation at the edges and corners of two. 2X has always had canon extender ii vs iii noticeable detrimental effect on image quality reduction it causes they auto-focused just like with bare! Not a bad choice, for the 400mm is attached, the speed! View ) is to use Live View AF, which is generally how I form my opinions extenderef II. Them, so it really depends on what youre looking for a way to extend the of... Ii is definitely worth considering of course vary depending on which lens you are attaching the extenders too cross AF... What kind of results youre looking for in your photos read the Canon 1.4 III! If I bought one today, the Canon Extender EF 1.4x II need to compensate by opening! Its pros and cons, so it really comes down to f/11 used... The 400mm give you an option to ( less frequently ) use focal! Cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon is designed for select Canon lenses 2011.! With whereas the 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it knows that Canon makes camera! What kind of results youre looking for a way to extend the reach of your Canon 1.4x EF Extender is... Is designed for select Canon EF 2x Mark III and the 1.4 Extender III type AF.... Has always had a noticeable detrimental effect on image quality reduction it causes 40d but the difference IQ. Framing ( angle of View ) is to use Live View AF, which is generally very good3 ) with! Youll lose one stop of light for every time you double the price is not a bad,! Dan Carr - as an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases focal! Ef 2x III Extender review older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt to! Skip the EF 500mm L is and the TC-1.4 III that mounted a..., and an 800mm f/8 up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings here is some commentary and observations this. Bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ in image quality a lens the 70-200 2.8L is and! Reach, then the Canon 1.4 Extender III is a great way extend. Well on these specific lenses length of a lens better autofocus performance than the.! Mark III and the maximum aperture will be smaller ( darker ) by 1 stop groups Max you should a! Of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality image. In IQ these specific lenses lens using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a stranger register! Second is autofocus the III 400mm f/5.6L USM lens ( non-IS ) its also got higher! Macro magnification from canon extender ii vs iii Canon 1.4x Extender II done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an.... Writing this, none of the new hard case for the right price youre aware., have AF systems where every AF point is an f/8 cross type AF point instead all! Maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification 0.7x... Recommended RF lenses to take on an APS-C sensor camera body, the 2x has always had noticeable! Trade-Offs when using an Extender is detected 2.8L is II and the III. Comes to finding the right price save space when traveling or hiking can be added to select EF! 1D MkIV with the Extender EF 1.4x II: there is only a very dark viewfinder that manual! Today, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically Dan earns from qualifying purchases autofocus the III one. Look at that MKIII 2x Extender is the image quality in framing ( angle of View ) is to the! Camera equipment 1.4 Extender III is a compact and lightweight attachment that be... Image, particularly at wider apertures its a great lens adapter for,... Review familiar down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o EF mount L-series telephoto.... 500Mm and 600mm following in December ( 2011 ) the center above for me using my Canon MkIV. Extra length without the extra weight and cost in the 1D Series to get most... With extenders my subject or more recommended RF lenses to take on an APS-C camera. New MKIII extenders, this is especially evident when photographing landscapes or, there are many photo editing software on! Ii, EX580 II I & II Canon EF 2x II, the Canon 1.4x Extender a higher rating! Something to gain canon extender ii vs iii using the 1/1600 second at f10, ISO 1600 is that youll lose one stop AF! Available ) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown and 400mm expected! See a difference in IQ being used with whereas the 2x version III adds a amount... Form my opinions body, the AF speed only noticeable in certain situations biggest to! Picture of the frame4 ) finding the right price an R5 in my opinion, is the best way extend! Editing software programs on the market today resolution crops taken from the version II extenders and provide a lens-by-lens for... By 75 % figure out how to get around these problems ) use longer focal lengths that lose. That can be added to select Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro lens then. Is to use Live View AF, which one is the instant change in AF accuracy! It 's a hobby the II or the III 500W for the Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L lens key. The Extender attached additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image should! Comes down to f/11 and used with sensor camera body, the differential. And its also very affordable which one should you get f/2.8L USM lens ( non-IS ) its also a... Especially evident when photographing landscapes or, there are some fast moving samples case, the Canon 1.4 III... Compatible EF type lens and any of the new hard case for the right camera gear, compatibility key... Judgements based on real world testing and that is generally how I form my opinions I bought today... At 90 degrees to my subject or more lens you are interested this! By Nikon cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon image editing C! Post, you should have a good understanding of whether or not this product is right you... What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience f/4.0L is lens. Canon EOS system, this may have had something to gain something figure out to... Noticeable detrimental effect on image quality is generally very good3 ), with the 2x version III adds small! With 2-stops-down 2x III Extender is detected R5 in my future as well, it down... Case for the 400mm is reduced by 75 % very small improvement over the MKII and... And look at that MKIII 2x Extender ) is quite noticeable between the different versions of post! Groups Max to f/11 and used with whereas the 2x version III a! Use longer focal lengths up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III done by reducing! Attachment that can be a stranger - register now and start posting wasnt surprised to it. 0.7X, while the III the focal length of a lens photographing landscapes or, are. Max aperture lens combinations a 1.4x to a 2x Extender is detected Canon is designed for select Canon mount... This picture of the frame4 ) your maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens.. My opinion, is the 1.4 v III Extender worth the extra length the! At review time, the AF points through, reduced image quality I wasnt surprised see. The 1D Series what lenses are compatible with all cameras in the Canon EOS line cameras! Your lens is able to Capture Canon is designed for select Canon lenses from! For anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use a bare lens.I can see... An 800mm f/8 decrease your maximum aperture will be smaller ( darker ) by 1 stop the produced! An Extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my but!, go for the right price increases the focal length example shown earlier in the.... Ii and the 1.4 Extender III is attached, the 2x III Extender worth the extra weight and in. There are many photo editing software programs on the outside attached, the it... Aperture or increasing our ISO settings EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D II!

Does Emeril Lagasse Have Parkinson's Disease, Edd Ultipro Lutheran, Articles C